<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
      <title>Debate/Hot Topics - Scary Mommy</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/categories/debate-hot-topics/feed.rss</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 13 15:32:12 -0600</pubDate>
         <description>Debate/Hot Topics - Scary Mommy</description>
   <language>en-CA</language>
   <atom:link href="/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
   <item>
      <title>Blood alcohol level</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/25780/blood-alcohol-level</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:29:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Goddess</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25780@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Talk of moving it from .08 to .05 in line w other countries.  Ppl are pissy bc a 160 lb man (seriously? a man that weighs 160???) would have to cut his drinking from 3.5 beers per hour to two per hour. <br /><br />Am I the ONLY person who thinks its simple?  If you're going to drive, don't drink??]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Teen moms on tv vs. teen moms off tv</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24115/teen-moms-on-tv-vs-teen-moms-off-tv</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:26:25 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Momchalant</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24115@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so this was the title for my blog's post today. I don't have much traffic so I figured I would also take the topic here since you guys always give great feedback..</p><p>Basically, the title sums it up. I referenced the show Teen Mom and how they show the relationships between family, friends, and boys and the struggles young mothers have. </p><p>I was wondering what you guys thought about it? </p><p>I watch the show, and do think it can be educational and send a great message, but I'm also against that they pay the girls and that they focus too much on the relationships as opposed to focusing on the other struggles (main struggles) that young mothers, and even older mothers go through.</p>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>&quot;Walk away&quot; mommies</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/25525/walk-away-mommies</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 09:36:46 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>LilypadMom</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25525@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/04/opinion/drexler-mothers-leaving/index.html?hpt=hp_t4">http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/04/opinion/drexler-mothers-leaving/index.html?hpt=hp_t4</a></p><p>I found this article interesting, and had read about the Brenda Heist case - the Pennsylvania mom who dropped&nbsp;her kids off at school one day and went missing&nbsp;for 11 years, only to turn herself in last week&nbsp;and admit she just walked away.&nbsp; She was going through a divorce, had been denied assistance she applied for, and just gave up and went with some hitchhikers to Florida.</p><p>So just thought I'd post this here and get some SM thoughts on the article.&nbsp; We all know "walk away" dads are a dime a dozen and my ex is no different, so should we be shocked and disgusted when cases like this come up?&nbsp; We've all had our "mommy fail" moments or days.&nbsp; But has it ever gotten so bad that&nbsp;YOU&nbsp;seriously considered&nbsp;disappearing and starting over somewhere new?&nbsp; Do you know anyone who has?&nbsp; I've seen many confessions that state as much so I'm thinking it's not as rare or new as they're making it out to be.&nbsp; </p><p>I will admit this HAS crossed my mind a time or two, but only along the lines of leaving DS with my parents while I start over somewhere, get established with a good place to live, and then have him come back&nbsp;to live with&nbsp;me.&nbsp; I've never acted on it, because just the thought of being away from him for an extended time&nbsp;is painful and I know what it would do to him.&nbsp; So along those lines, I guess I <em>cannot</em> fathom being a walk away mom or any mom actually doing it.&nbsp; How about the rest of you SM's?</p>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Burying the Boston bomber</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/25469/burying-the-boston-bomber</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 06:34:38 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>shouldclean</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25469@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[So yesterday the man who supposedly (I choose this word because I believe in our justice system, innocent until proven.guilty and all that) bombed the Boston Marathon was brought to a funeral home in Worcester, the city I live in.  Last night at tee ball the other moms where very vocal about how they felt.  Send him oversees, he doesn't deserve to be buried, etc., etc., etc.<br /><br />Now, I truly believe he was a bad, bad man.  But, there were people who loved him and still do.  He had a wife and child.  Don't they deserve some closure?  <br /><br />Now, play nice, I don't think any of us disagree that he was one of the worst types of scumbags there are.  But what<br /> is the proper thing to do?<br /><br />This is an article from our local paper.<br /> <a href="http://www.telegram.com/article/20130504/NEWS/105049974/1116/mobile&amp;TEMPLATE=MOBILE" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegram.com/article/20130504/NEWS/105049974/1116/mobile&amp;TEMPLATE=MOBILE</a>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Prostitution</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/25087/prostitution</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:12:43 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ABC</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25087@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Do you think prostitution should be legal? Obviously if they are minors, no! But what about an adult woman. They are not just druggies loose on the streets. Some work as "high class" escorts. Prostitution is illegal but pornography is not. So you can get paid to screw while recorded but not any other way? I don't know. To me, it's the least of my worries as far as crime goes. Sure if there's abuse going on (children or other abuse) or something more sinister, that should be stopped. But I am just not convinced it's more serious than say catching a pedophile, or murders, or any other severe crime. What say you? I have mixed feelings...not for it but not sure if it's more sinister than murder, just saying).<br /><br />(watching a show about sex slaves on MSNBC)]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Peanut Allergies and schools</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/25251/peanut-allergies-and-schools</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:51:37 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>shate98</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25251@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[So, this article is sparking a lot of comments on my fb feed. Wondering what you all thought. How obligated are public schools to cater to the needs of a few students with life threatening allergies? <br><br>One of the comments I saw asked what would happen when all of these kids with peanut allergies get into the workforce. Should places of employment also be forced to go peanut free?<br><br><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.parenting.com/blogs/show-and-tell/brian-braiker/food-allergies-schools?src=SOC&amp;dom=fb">article</a><h1 class="pane-title">Mom Suing School for Not Going Peanut-Free</h1>April 25, 2013  <br><br>    	<div class="views-field-common-credit">by <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.parenting.com/blogs/brian-parentingcom">Brian Braiker</a></div><br><br><p class="p1">How far should a school go to accomodate a student with severe allergies?&nbsp;</p><br><p class="p1">One Detroit mom is suing her public school district <br>because, she charges, they have not gone far enough.&nbsp;Kathy Williams says<br> her son Nick, 10, could die if he is exposed to peanuts, so she asked <br>that her entire school to go peanut and tree-nut free.&nbsp;When the school <br>declined, she filed suit against Livonia Public Schools.&nbsp;</p><br><p class="p1"><strong>Plus: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.parenting.com/article/truth-about-food-allergies?cid=plusblog">The Truth About Food Allergies</a></strong></p><br><p class="p1">“We had asked them to go peanut and tree nut-free, and <br>their response to us was, due to the upset in the community and the <br>backlash from other parents, we refuse to change practices,” Williams <a rel="nofollow" href="http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2013/04/24/mom-demands-school-go-peanut-free-for-allergic-child/">told a local CBS affiliate</a>.&nbsp;</p><br><p class="p1">”He’s been bullied; he’s been picked on; he’s been beaten <br>up … had his medicine stolen,” Williams added. She alleges that Nick <br>must eat his lunch in "an office with cinder block walls," which she <br>says is alienating and unfair.&nbsp;</p><br><p class="p1">Williams also alleges that other area school districts <br>have made certain buildings peanut-free if a student has a deadly form <br>of the allergy.</p><br><p class="p1">Williams said she’s been on the&nbsp;receiving&nbsp;end of harsh <br>criticism from other parents. “‘Why should we have to do this for one <br>child'?" she says she has been asked. "‘Why don’t you keep him at home? <br>He doesn’t deserve to be here."</p><br><p class="p1"><strong>Plus: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.parenting.com/article/the-allergy-epidemic?cid=plusblog">The Allergy Epidemic</a></strong></p><br><p class="p1">Livonia declined to comment to CBS in a statement saying <br>that because of pending litigation they were not at liberty to comment, <br>but are doing all they can to&nbsp;accommodate&nbsp;the student.</p><br>What's your take? Does the school have an obligation to go<br> nut-free? Or is it the responsibility of the child and his parents to <br>be vigilant?<br>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Sexual Harassment---views, opinions</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/25261/sexual-harassment-views-opinions</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:43:18 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MistressHeidi</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25261@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Today I had to talk to a rep from our HR dept. It seems one of our female employees has accused one of the male employees of sexual harassment. So I had to spend 10 minutes or so on the phone being asked if I had heard anything or if anything obscene had been said to me at any time. Since I live and work 3 hours away from the office I had no idea any of this was going on, had not heard anything, had no knowledge of it before this investigation started.<br><br>What was said, was that the guy would like to have a fivesome and get a sixth girl to video tape it. Or something to that effect. I'm not sure of the exact wording. Not right for the work place. Okay, I'll agree with that. Offensive? I guess so. Most likely he was joking and trying to be shocking and meant no real harm in the comment.<br><br>And thats where I am, kind of stradling the fence on this. Most of the office is on one side or the other, They either feel that he is very very very wrong and should be crucified or they don't think its a big deal and that everyone should lighten up.<br><br>I know from the numerous times that we have had to sit through sexual harassment training that if its offensive to one person than its wrong. So I guess its really a moot point.<br><br>I'm just looking for other ideas, others thoughts, others opinions. What is okay and not okay in the work place? Is some joking okay? Where should the line be drawn?<br>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>The bug poll.  Which is it?</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24585/the-bug-poll-which-is-it</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:35:05 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Momentures</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24585@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[So we have a running debate in our house. &nbsp;Which is it slug bug or punch buggy when you see a Volkswagon Beetle? &nbsp;Please write the state you were in when you first heard it. &nbsp;<div><br></div><div>If the hubs tells me mine doesn't make any sense one more time Ima beat his ass. &nbsp;We grew up in vastly different areas and I'd never even heard of the one he says until he told me 15 years ago and we've been arguing about it ever since!</div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>IEPs, Special Ed, and Mainstreaming</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/25210/ieps-special-ed-and-mainstreaming</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:54:51 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Love</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25210@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">Concern for the challenges young people with IEPs face as they try to make a</span><br><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">successful transition from secondary school to adulthood has focused a spotlight on transition</span><br><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">issues, beginning in elementary school, all the way through post-secondary education. It has been debated among the highest levels of educators and researchers, for a long time.</span><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;"><br></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/should-children-with-special-needs-be-taught-in-a-mainstream-class-20110701-1gv3a.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/should-children-with-special-needs-be-taught-in-a-mainstream-class-20110701-1gv3a.html</a></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;"><br></span></div><div>THE SENATOR: SUE BOYCE<br><br></div><div>All students, irrespective of their disability, should be educated in mainstream schools. That's what inclusive education, an alleged aspiration and requirement of state and federal governments for 40 years or so, means.<br>All governments pay lip service to inclusive education but practice is, at best, patchy and, at times, perverted. A few years ago, the Queensland Education Department even managed to include special schools in its examples of "inclusive education", to howls of protest.<br>But all governments regularly include special education units in their inclusive education figures, irrespective of whether the units offer genuine educational support or function as separate "special school" islands within the mainstream school grounds.<br>Advertisement  <br>The WA education academic, Professor Bob Jackson, has said there is no research anywhere in the world that special schooling - segregated education - produces better outcomes for students with disabilities.<br>On the other hand, there are many studies demonstrating that inclusive education produces better outcomes for all students.<br>I've come to the view that the only way to make inclusive education a reality is to close down the special schools, and move all their resources into the mainstream system.<br>If mainstream schools had no option but to accept children with disabilities, they would concentrate on how to make it work, not how to avoid getting involved. If state governments had no option, they would better fund schools, teachers and training bodies to make it work.<br>I'm not advocating that students currently in special schools be immediately sent off as little human ''experiments'' into the mainstream system. I acknowledge that parents who choose special schooling for their child do so because it's the current best option for their child.<br>I also acknowledge that there are many reasonable objections to sending all children with disabilities into our mainstream schools, but they are all problems with the system, not with the children.<br>What are we teaching children in mainstream schools about lifelong inclusion as they watch the ''special'' bus take the ''special'' children to their ''special'' school every day? What are we teaching children with disabilities and their families about their worth by telling them they can't ''fit''?<br>Is it any wonder that adults with disabilities struggle to find work in open employment, or have a real social life?</div><div><br>Senator Sue Boyce is an LNP senator for Queensland and parent of an adult daughter with Down syndrome.<br><br></div><div><br></div><div><div>THE ADVOCATE BOB BUCKLEY</div><div><br></div><div>Inclusion ideology dominates education policy. Inclusion believers claim that properly implemented, inclusive education is the ultimate answer to educating students with a disability.</div><div>I support inclusive education, or mainstreaming, but only when appropriate: All students with a disability should get an effective education in the least restrictive setting. Inclusive education practice is far from ideal, and the evidence does not show that even ideal mainstreaming can meet the needs of all students with a disability.</div><div>Many students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are mainstreamed in primary schools but they may have more difficulty in high school. Their developmental trajectory differs from ''normal teenagers''. There is no evidence that these students need to relate to ''normal teenagers''; and most ''normal teenagers'' do not want to relate to them. We need to respect the wishes of students with ASD who do not want to be mainstreamed.</div><div>Most teens like to associate with their peers. Mainstream schools segregate students into classes by age, subject interest, sport and sometimes proficiency, ability or gender. But mainstreaming isolates students with a disability from peers, denying them right of freedom of association.</div><div>Inclusion zealots think I am mad. They say there is strong statistical evidence that students with a disability can be educated effectively in mainstream settings. But simple statistics are not always clear. Imagine mainstreaming as a lake with average depth 20cm. Many students with ASD flounder in the deeper parts.</div><div>The zealots just ignore "complications". Students with ASD are four times more likely to be bullied in mainstream schools; in other words bullying is close to a certainty for students with ASD. Unless a student with ASD is especially resilient, this detriment may outweigh any benefit from mainstreaming.</div><div>Many mainstream schools, inadvertently, teach challenging behaviours to students with ASD so the students are often excluded from school. There is no educational safety net for them. The best measure of education effectiveness is whether people get a job and live independently. Today, most people with autism leave school and go onto the Disability Support Pension. On this measure, mainstream and special education are not effective.</div><div>Many schools do not have the ability to educate students with ASD. The absence of other essential services is a huge part of the problem. The available evidence does not show mainstreaming is best practice for all students with ASD.</div><div><br></div><div>Bob Buckley is convenor of Autism Aspergers Advocacy Australia.</div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div><div><div>THE ACADEMIC: KIRSTY YOUNG</div><div>Inclusion, where all children - regardless of ability - are educated together, has been debated for decades but special-needs education has not changed substantially. The debate is fundamentally a human rights issue, grounded in principles of normalisation, that all children should enjoy a non-segregated, unrestricted lifestyle with full access to culturally normative resources.</div><div>However, inclusion in our education system is not automatically in the best interest of every child. Consideration must be given to the potential of a child to function as an adult, and the skills and behaviours needed to achieve this. At present, intensive and focused teaching in a segregated classroom is more likely to result in acquisition of functional skills, particularly where learning experiences incorporate real-world exposure. The level of differentiated instruction required to develop some functional skills is not possible in mainstream classrooms.</div><div>School and classroom design has not evolved and this has stagnated the inclusion movement. Advocates of a unified schooling system, where all resources and personnel are at one location, are on the right track. The reality is students with special needs are a small percentage of the population and cannot drive a fundamental shift in education. Expansion of the debate beyond special education to a general education and social issue would be useful. From this perspective, the overall design of the school space can be reconceptualised.</div><div>Consider a school built around learning centres, where teams of specialist educators work together to support all learners to reach their potential. Incorporating a technology centre, where some students are developing ''apps'' while others are learning basic internet search techniques; a literacy centre, where some engage in text analysis while others learn sight words; an environmental centre, where some workshop sustainability issues while others learn how to use public transport; and so on. Centres that do not exist solely to educate children from 9am to 3pm but, potentially, are used 24 hours a day and seen as essential community spaces. Centres where students with special educational needs are truly incorporated, and valued, as part of a learning community that extends into the broader community.</div><div><br></div><div>Dr Kirsty Young is senior lecturer in education at the University of Technology, Sydney.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div>THE PARENT: KAREN PAKULA</div><div>To a quirky girl on the autism spectrum, the laws of the schoolyard are a mystery, and my daughter wandered about in a bubble, wondering which way was up. Concerned and at a loss to help, her kindergarten teacher suggested I investigate a special school. The children I saw there were barely verbal and were disconnected from the world.</div><div>There was no perfect fit but her father and I decided she'd be best close to home, at the local primary school, with the chance to make friends from the neighbourhood and the security of her big sister in a classroom nearby.</div><div>We were unprepared for what lay ahead. In year 1, she was "dis-enrolled" from Reading Recovery for failing to progress and, based on subsequent testing by the school, I was told she may never manage to read.</div><div>The Education Department has a zeal for testing. Every few years we were dispatched to psychologists for yet another diagnosis to satisfy the gatekeepers in charge of support funding. And to my great regret, I gave permission for my daughter to sit the basic skills exams after being told it would shore up the school's funding. The results told us nothing new and I discovered months later she had to be prised, in tears, out of hiding in the toilets to attend.</div><div>Unfortunately, success at school for a child like mine is at the mercy of number crunchers. But, I was told, we were lucky. The school was allocated funding to support a teacher's aide for 2½ hours a week, which is as good as it gets. But not nearly enough.</div><div>Like good middle-class parents, we paid for extra tuition. It was very successful and very expensive. It required back-up at home and my daughter slogged away at an evil number of dull little books for 20 minutes a day, six days a week. It took more than two years but she got there. She became a fluent, independent reader. The tests were wrong after all. She needed time, patience and Simpsons stickers.</div><div>The question for me is: how can mainstream schools adapt to best serve children with intellectual disabilities? If the department can't afford to support such intensive lessons, why not offer incentives to attract and retain aides? Think of the uni students who might sign up for a reduction in fees or extra course credits. The Education Department could certainly use some new inspiration.</div><div><br></div><div>Karen Pakula is a Sydney writer.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b>How do you feel about this issue?</b></div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>is it too soon for a debate? HOT TOPIC..burned my ass a bit...</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/25031/is-it-too-soon-for-a-debate-hot-topic-burned-my-ass-a-bit-</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:27:19 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marionettevie</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25031@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<b>i'm sure that anyone that has a FB has already seen this... its attached to a picture of the actor Robin Williams... now i don't know if he actually made that speech but this is the text that comes with the picture. </b><br><i>"<span class="userContent">ROBIN WILLLIANS MADE THIS SPEECH IN NEW YORK . <br> <br> The Plan!<br> <br> Robin Williams, wearing a shirt that says 'I love New York ' in Arabic.<br> <br><span class="text_exposed_show"> Robin Williams' plan...(Hard to argue with this logic!)<br> <br> "I see a lot of people yelling for peace but I have not heard of a plan for peace. So, here's one plan": <br> <br><br> 1) 'The US, UK , CANADA and AUSTRALIA will apologize to the world for <br>our 'interference' in their affairs, past &amp; present. You know, <br>Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Tojo, Noriega, Milosevic, Hussein, and the <br>rest of those 'good 'ole' boys', we will never 'interfere' again.<br> <br><br> 2) We will withdraw our troops from all over the world, starting <br>withGermany , South Korea , the Middle East, and the Philippines . They <br>don't want us there. We would station troops at our borders. No one <br>allowed sneaking through holes in the fence.<br> <br> 3) All illegal <br>aliens have 90 days to get their affairs together and leave. We'll give <br>them a free trip home. After 90 days the remainder will be gathered up <br>and deported immediately, regardless of whom or where they are from. <br>They're illegal!!! France will welcome them. <br> <br> 4) All future <br>visitors will be thoroughly checked and limited to 90 days unless given a<br> special permit!!!! No one from a terrorist nation will be allowed in. <br>If you don't like it there, change it yourself and don't hide here. <br>Asylum would never be available to anyone. We don't need any more cab <br>drivers or 7-11 cashiers.<br> <br> 5) No foreign 'students' over age 21.<br> The older ones are the bombers. If they don't att end classes, they get<br> a 'D' and it's back home baby. <br> <br> 6) The US, UK , CANADA and <br>AUSTRALIA will make a strong effort to become self-sufficient energy <br>wise. This will include developing non-polluting sources of energy but <br>will require a temporary drilling of oil in the Alaskan wilderness. The <br>caribou will have to cope for a while. <br> <br> <br> <br> 7) Offer <br>Saudi Arabia and other oil producing countries $10 a barrel for their <br>oil. If they don't like it, we go someplace else. They can go somewhere <br>else to sell their production. (About a week of the wells filling up the<br> storage sites would be enough.)<br> <br> <br> <br> 8) If there is a <br>famine or other natural catastrophe in the world, we will not <br>'interfere..' They can pray to Allah or whomever, for seeds, rain, <br>cement or whatever they need. Besides most of what we give them is <br>stolen or given to the army.. The people who need it most get very <br>little, if anything.<br> <br> 9) Ship the UN Headquarters to an isolated<br> island someplace. We don't need the spies and fair weather friends <br>here. Besides, the building would make a good homeless shelter or lockup<br> for illegal aliens.<br> <br> 10) All Americans must go to charm and <br>beauty school. That way, no one can call us 'Ugly Americans' any longer.<br> The Language we speak is ENGLISH...learn it...or LEAVE. Now, isn't that<br> a winner of a plan? <br> The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying <br>'Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses.' She's got a <br>baseball bat and she's yelling, 'you want a piece of me?' '"<br><br></span></span></i><span class="userContent"><span class="text_exposed_show"><b>I'm not sure if you know but i was not born here. i was born in Mexico. I moved here when i was 3. and for a very long time i was a very proud mexican. When i became a citizen i was a very Proud american... and now i have grown up a little more and i am just proud of my accomplishments. and it kinda BURNS MY ASS when people make such stupid almost racist and (i cant even find the word to fit this right now) agh! comments.... i posted THIS in reply to that </b><br><i>"</i></span></span><i><span> </span><span><span class="UFICommentBody"><span><span>i<br> like abut 90% of that.... some things i just dont agree with... no <br>foreign students? so some of these 3rd world countries will never <br>improve... because we know that there are loads of people who come here <br>on student visas older than 21, and end up go</span></span><span><span><span>ing<br> back to their home country after they graduate and do amazing things <br>with an education that they would have never had if this country didnt <br>give them the opportunity to learn.</span><br><span>and a d? when half the american students in high school dont even graduate because "its too hard"</span><br><span>no<br> one from a terrorist nation? so basically because you couldnt help <br>where you were born, you are now being lumped with terrorists... and you<br> cant ever get the hell out of the very violent country you grew up in <br>to make a better life for yourself, and possibly your children. that is <br>IF you dont get killed/kidnapped/raped/etc while growing up in said <br>country. </span><br><br><span>what about actors/artists? im not sure that justin beaver has a fucking residency card... yet he lives in Calabasas. </span><br><br><span>i<br> am now a citizen of this country. but it wasnt always like this. no i <br>didnt have an "anchor baby" although my son WAS born on american soil. i<br> didnt marry an american citizen to become a citizen. although when i <br>was sworn in i was already in a relationship with him. i became a <br>citizen at 18... but i have lived here since i was 3. when people hear <br>me speak they have no idea that i am bilingual.... but my first language<br> is spanish, and i can read, write and speak it perfectly. i did not <br>know english too well until i was about 8 or 9 years old. i learned it <br>and can probably spell better than half of the kids that graduated in my<br> class... but we tell anyone who wasnt born here to "learn english" when<br> we cant even write full sentence correctly. its kinda fucked up that we<br> are so closed minded. we have to remember that terrorists are not <br>always "foreigners" </span><br><span>Columbine,<br> Colorado, and Newtown are just some examples of terrorists that werent <br>foreigners.... yet you dont hear all these americans saying "get rid of <br>all these white boys because they are all crazy!"  </span><br><span>Compassion is the way to peace! not segregation, close mindedness, and racism."<br><br></span></span></span></span></span></i><span><span class="UFICommentBody"><span><span><span><b>now im wondering how many people actually agree with EVERYTHING that robin williams apparently said? i do agree that we need to get troops out of certain places. i do agree that maybe we should be more cautious when we send help, or at least make sure its being used for what we sent it for. i also agree that we should be looking for better energy sources.&nbsp; but to make comments like "the older ones are the bombers" and "we dont need any more 7-11s or cab drivers" what the fuck. that is so fucked up! and i hear shit like this from "MERICANS" all the damn time.... "send all the mexicans back. we dont need any gardeners/cleaning ladies/etc" and i kinda want to say "well are you gonna put all your welfare recipients in those positions, because as far as i see, these unwanted mexicans are doing all the unwanted jobs." that comment is fucked up too, but is the white guy living off of welfare because his baby mamas has 5 kids&nbsp; each with him really gonna go out and clean peoples toilets?&nbsp; no... is the natural born citizen who has all these "rights" really gonna go out and pick produce in the summer? i dont think so.... im totally profiling here and i hate it but its mostly from people like that where these types of comments about "foreigners" come from... so fucking hateful! </b><br></span></span></span></span></span>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>HOW DARE THEY!? Please read!</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24923/how-dare-they-please-read</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 06:18:47 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chocoholic</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24923@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Westboro Baptist Church is planning on picketing the funerals of the victims of the Boston Marathon bombings... We will be there to form a human wall, and ask that anyone who can join us in protecting the family, do so.<br /><br /><br />From the US News Report:<br /><br />Boston Bombing Funerals Will Be Picketed, Westboro Baptist Church Says<br /><br />In a tweeting binge following the explosions at the finish line of the Boston Marathon on Monday, the Westboro Baptist Church celebrated the carnage and announced its intention to picket the funerals of victims.<br /><br />The tiny Topeka, Kan., fundamentalist group urged the U.S. government to "reinstate" the death penalty for homosexuality and warned "violence will fully consume u [sic]" if that doesn't happen. Most of the church's tweets said same-sex marriage caused the bombing, but others mentioned abortion and supposed mistreatment of the church.<br /><br />A news release dated April 15 announced the church's intention to picket the funerals of the three bombing victims. Massachusetts, the release says, "invited this special wrath from God Almighty when it was the FIRST STATE to pass same-sex marriage" in 2004. "Westboro Baptist Church to picket funerals of those dead by Boston Bombs! GOD SENT THE BOMBS IN FURY OVER FAG MARRIAGE! <a href="/message-board/index.php?p=/search&amp;Search=%23PraiseGod&amp;Mode=like">#PraiseGod</a>," said a tweet from the church's <a href="/message-board/index.php?p=/profile/WBCFliers">@WBCFliers</a> account.<br /><br /><br /><br />I am PROUD to be from the first state to legalize marriage equality. And I know BOSTON will kick some ignorant, bigoted asses - right <a href="/message-board/index.php?p=/profile/wickeddunkiejunkie">@wickeddunkiejunkie</a>?!]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>The &quot;novite&quot; trend!?!?</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24820/the-novite-trend</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:55:15 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chocoholic</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24820@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Ok, so I just receive my very first "novite", aka a friend sending me a message that she is sorry, but I am NOT invited to her wedding.<br><br><br>I. Was. Floored.<br><br>Not because I wasn't invited- I actually didn't expect to be, but is this really a THING?<br><br>Her message just said, basically, "I'm sorry, but you didn't make the cut". <br><br>Do you think it is appropriate/socially acceptable to send out NOT invited messages? <br>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>#prayforboston</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24887/prayforboston</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:52:27 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Momchalant</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24887@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I know a ton of people are distraught over this horrible tragedy. Most people don't exactly know what to say, myself included. </p><p>But I did want to say one thing.. Depsite such an evil act of violence, there will ALWAYS be more good than evil in the world.</p><p>I extend my thoughts and prayers to everyone affected by this horrifying situation.</p><p>Smile, because someone may need to see it. Love, because someone may need to feel it. And pray, because someone may need to hear it.</p>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Staying &quot;for the kids&quot;</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24448/staying-for-the-kids</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:29:06 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>LilypadMom</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24448@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I hate this term.&nbsp; Hate it, hate it, hate it.</p><p>I'm just getting so tired of seeing it, especially in confessions.&nbsp; So many that&nbsp;admit staying in bad marriages&nbsp;"for the kids".&nbsp; WHY do you think your kids will be happy seeing you're not?!&nbsp;&nbsp; Don't you want your kid(s) to have a happy parent?&nbsp; Yes, I get that it's hard to leave especially for a SAHP who is financially dependent on their spouse.&nbsp; But there is ALWAYS somewhere to go - family, friends, shelters, support groups, etc,&nbsp;and&nbsp;your&nbsp;spouse&nbsp;will continue to be legally bound to&nbsp;provide for you and the kids through child support and alimony.&nbsp; </p><p>My biggest peeve is when finances aren't really&nbsp;the excuse (yes, <em>excuse</em>), and the reason is you want the kids to have&nbsp;a family with both parents in the house.&nbsp; Yes, in an ideal world, that's how they would be raised.&nbsp; But believe me, I spent <em>10 years of my childhood</em> being one of those kids and it SUCKED majorly!&nbsp; My parents divorced when I was a few years old, and my mom remarried when I was 5.&nbsp; I lived with her and my new stepdad,&nbsp;going to my dad's house on the weekends.&nbsp; I remember that my stepdad was great at first, he took me fishing and we did lots of stuff together.&nbsp; But then my mom got pregnant with my brother, my stepdad started drinking,&nbsp;and by the time my sister came along two years later he was a fully fledged mean, drunk, asshole alcoholic.&nbsp; However my mom refused to leave him because she didn't want to a) have a second divorce, b) split up my siblings' parents and have them growing up shuttled to two different homes, like me, and c) she convinced herself she could "fix" him back to the way he was and keep her family together and happy.</p><p>So as a result of that, my childhood is riddled with crystal clear memories of them&nbsp;fighting, screaming, mom crying, police calls,&nbsp;and being afraid to go to bed at night for fear of not waking up, or what I would wake up to.&nbsp; It never changed - my stepfather always woke up mean with a hangover, went out to start drinking after lunch, and by evening or night my mom was calling around to bars and friends' houses trying to track him down.&nbsp; She pasted a smile on her face for us&nbsp;and pretended for us that everything was okay, but even as kids we knew better and "happy" was not something we felt often, if at all.&nbsp; </p><p>My stepdad would eventually come stumbling home drunk off his ass at some point after we went to bed, and we were inevitably woken by his shouting profanities, threats, and insults, and him screaming about what a worthless piece of shit our mother was.&nbsp; I never saw bruises so I know she wasn't physically abused, but the verbal abuse was more than enough.&nbsp; I even remember hearing what I later realized as I grew up was him raping her, because I would hear the noises and later see her walking by the door hugging her clothes to her chest and crying, locking herself in the bathroom to clean up then going to sleep on the couch after he passed out in their room.</p><p>Later it got even better (heavy sarcasm).&nbsp; My mom decided she didn't trust him out at the bars by himself, so she would go with him even if it meant putting up with his drunken verbal abuse in public.&nbsp; Oh and because we were always broke she couldn't afford a babysitter, and didn't want our family to know we weren't the perfect family, so she TOOK US WITH THEM to bars most of the time (back when they allowed kids at any hour, don't think they do that now).&nbsp; So they'd pack us along&nbsp;to a bar, or a drinking buddy's house, where we'd get planted at a table with cokes,&nbsp;and expected to be good until "daddy" was ready to leave.&nbsp; This entailed us watching him get drunker and drunker while my mom got more tense and worried, ending with her finally convincing him to leave because he couldn't stand up anymore.</p><p>Of course this led to his drunk ass insisting he would drive, so we got piled into the covered bed of his truck and endured a terrifyingly fast, weaving, jerking, brake slamming, tire screeching ride home while listening to him scream at our mother in the cab, her sobbing, and me generally waiting/hoping for us to plow into a tree and die so it could finally be over.&nbsp; I don't know how we never did, but it was not for his lack of trying to kill us in this manner, because I remember too many of these rides home.</p><p>Finally when I was older I began calling my dad to "come and get me" because my stepdad was being drunk and mean again.&nbsp; More than once my dad arrived with the police in tow, but nothing ever changed that I noticed until my mom finally agreed to reverse the custody, and let me live with my dad while visiting them on the weekends.&nbsp; Those two days of the week were still the most terrifying of my life, and my dad&nbsp;finally managed to get it switched to every other weekend, and then to where he would drop me off with her and my siblings to spend time with them&nbsp;in public for a few hours, with my stepdad not around.&nbsp; Which was great for me, but my brother and sister still had to live with that hell at home and it wasn't until I was in high school that my mom finally left him and got a divorce.&nbsp; I don't know what finally made her do it, but was glad she did, though sad that it took until my siblings were 6-8 years old and all they knew of childhood to that point was screaming fights and&nbsp;a verbally beaten down, weak, "put on a happy face" mother - all for the sake of "staying together for the kids".</p><p>Today, my siblings don't remember much of this.&nbsp; They were young at the time but I have a feeling they've probably blocked a lot of it out as well, since I remember pretty clearly from the time I was 5.&nbsp; Not surprisingly, my stepfather died of cirrhosis&nbsp;in his early 40's.&nbsp; My mother had a second bad relationship with another guy (not an alcoholic), got out of it a few years afterwards, and has been single since.&nbsp; </p><p>To this day, although I never&nbsp;say anything,&nbsp;I hold resentment to her staying with my stepfather so long and thus subjecting us to the childhood from hell.&nbsp; Yes she eventually got out of it, but for me, it was too little too late and we've never had the mother-daughter relationship I think we could have had if I'd grown up with a mother that was genuinely happy and strong enough to stand up for herself and her kids' needs.&nbsp; Ironically this bond came with my stepmother, my dad's third wife (the second was awful but not as bad as my stepdad), who was previously&nbsp;in an intensely abusive relationship with my stepsisters' father and got them out of there.&nbsp; She and my dad have been together 15 years now and I've always gone to her for the "mom" advice I need, while my mother and I maintain more of a friend relationship.</p><p>Yes, I know not every bad relationship with kids is to this extreme - some are WORSE, some are just plain unhappy because they're not right for each other or are bored, but I always get SO pissed off when I see a statement that someone is keeping a bad marriage together "for the kids" and not wanting to put them through a separation (because a childhood like ours was much better).&nbsp; </p><p>As one of THOSE kids who had to suffer for this reason, I can tell you that your kids are sponges and almost psychic when it comes to your mood.&nbsp; You can put on a happy face all you want, you can pretend to the world that everything is fine, but your kids&nbsp;WILL soak in the unhappiness no matter how you try to mask it.&nbsp; They'll see through the cracks in the façade, that slip in the smile that doesn't reach your eyes,&nbsp;they will hear the fights and pick up on the tense atmosphere that follows, will hear the crying while someone slams out the door, and will see their friends' genuinely happy moms and dads and wonder why their own parents don't act that way.</p><p>So please, please, please, think of your kids first and be honest with yourself when you're thinking staying in an unhappy (or worse) marriage is really "for them" and their best interests.&nbsp; I would so much rather have grown up seeing parents that were 100% happy and loving life, even if it meant spending certain days with dad and certain days with mom in different houses (hey two bedrooms, two sets of toys, double the attention!)...because a child growing up with genuinely happy parents, even&nbsp;separated, is going to be far better off than a child growing up like I did, watching a pasted together marriage that seemed like it would go on forever and wondering what having a happy mommy and daddy&nbsp;would be like.</p>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Forced Sterilization</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24468/forced-sterilization</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 05:46:12 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MarySunshine</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24468@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I was perusing my Facebook this AM when I came across a post from WipeOut Transphobia. This is the article they linked in the post:<br />Fear of “third gender” prompts some Swedish legislators to retain transgender sterilization law<br /><br /><a href="http://lexiecannes.wordpress.com/2013/04/04/fear-of-third-gender-prompts-some-swedish-legislators-to-retain-transgender-sterilization-law/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://lexiecannes.wordpress.com/2013/04/04/fear-of-third-gender-prompts-some-swedish-legislators-to-retain-transgender-sterilization-law/</a><br /><br />THE GUERRILLA ANGEL REPORT — Never mind a recent Swedish court ruling stating the current practice of forced sterilization of transgender citizens was a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights, some legislators are arguing that the practice remain in place.<br /><br />Fearing a “third gender,” Swedish Members of Parliament Tuve Skanberg and Annelie Enochson are opposing efforts in Parliament to enact legislation to delete the a requirement of sterilization for transitioning Swedish citizens.<br /><br />It’s a bit early to tell if there is widespread support for this.<br /><br />More about the Swedish court ruling on sterilization: <a href="http://lexiecannes.wordpress.com/2013/01/10/forced-sterilization-of-trans-patients-following-sex-reassignment-surgery-ends-in-sweden/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://lexiecannes.wordpress.com/2013/01/10/forced-sterilization-of-trans-patients-following-sex-reassignment-surgery-ends-in-sweden/</a><br /><br />In an earlier report, I wrote about the United Nations’ position that forced sterilization was torture. This is from the a UN report on the matter: “…Medical care that causes severe suffering for no justifiable reason can be considered cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and if there is State involvement and specific intent, it is torture.”<br /><br />More: <a href="http://lexiecannes.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/un-report-says-forced-transgender-reparative-therapy-sterilization-is-torture/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://lexiecannes.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/un-report-says-forced-transgender-reparative-therapy-sterilization-is-torture/</a><br /><br />—————<br />While these two may consist of a minority of the Swedish Parliament, their actions are very Orwellianish and most certainly yet another blemish on an otherwise civilized country. Not too long ago, a man was cleared of raping a trans woman because the judge argued the victim wasn’t “technically” a woman. A higher court however, overruled that judge and found the rapist guilty. More on that here: <a href="http://lexiecannes.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/rapist-freed-in-sweden-because-intended-female-victim-turned-out-to-be-transgender/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://lexiecannes.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/rapist-freed-in-sweden-because-intended-female-victim-turned-out-to-be-transgender/</a><br />---------------End Article-----------<br /><br />Now, I'm a bit of a "source" snob. This is more of a "watchdog" article, and it didn't provide links to other sources but itself, so I did a very quick look for other articles. I did find this one from TIME about the law being overturned last December. Here is that article:<br /><br />Transgender People in Sweden No Longer Face Forced Sterilization<br /><br /><br />ERIK MARTENSSON / SCANPIX / REUTERS<br />Participants march at an annual gay pride parade in central Stockholm August 4, 2012.<br /><br />Until late last week one of Europe’s most progressive nations had one of the continent’s most repressive policies on transgender people. Swedish law had required all transgender people to undergo sterilization if they want to legally change their sex. In a Dec. 19 decision, the Stockholm Administrative Court of Appeal overturned the law, declaring it unconstitutional.<br /><br />Sweden’s 1970s-era statutes on sexual identity mandated that any person who legally wanted to change their sex must be sterile. Transgender Swedes had to go through gender reassignment surgery to have their legal documents updated, and to comply with the law, they were also sterilized, whether or not they wanted to be.<br /><br />Liberal and moderate members of Sweden’s Parliament fought to repeal the law last year, but faced opposition from the conservative Christian Democrat party. The parties compromised by allowing transgender people to marry, which had been banned under the same law.<br /><br />Despite Sweden’s other LGBT-friendly laws (Parliament legalized gay marriage in 2009 by a hefty majority) and calls to end the mandate from human rights groups, it has so far remained. That is, until an unidentified plaintiff who wanted to update his legal gender but refused to be sterilized took his case to the Swedish Board of Health.<br /><br />Now, many of the estimated 500 people who have undergone forced sterilization since the law was passed are demanding compensation. Ulrika Westerlund, head of the Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights, told Swedish website The Local that 200,000 kronor, or $31,000, would be a “fair sum” for damages.<br /><br />“If lawmakers take the initiative to adopt a law outlining damages, we will not file a lawsuit,” she said.<br /><br />Perfection of the Nordic race through sterilization isn’t new, and neither is granting compensation to those affected. In 1999, Sweden granted 175,000 kronor in damages to women who had been sterilized under an infamous eugenics program that lasted 40 years.<br /><br />Sixteen European countries currently require transgender people to be sterilized before they undergo gender reassignment surgery, including France, Portugal and Italy. In Denmark, the Netherlands and Portugal, the law is under review.<br />(<a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/01/14/transgender-people-in-sweden-no-longer-face-forced-sterilization/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/01/14/transgender-people-in-sweden-no-longer-face-forced-sterilization/</a>)<br /><br />----------End Article----------------<br />So now there is a movement to repeal the overturning because, get this, people fear transgendered persons will produce a "third gender". Talk about a huge *facepalm*. Do they not teach basic biology in Sweden? DNA determines your physical gender, not your psychological make up. <br /><br />And what really ticks me off, Is that there are other asshole countries still requiring those wanting to undergo gender reassignment surgery to be sterilized. Don't let them catch wind of that over here... Although, it would be tough. The UN has said that this kind of forced surgery can be viewed as cruel and, when performed under the orders of State, can even be considered torture. <br /><br />My opinion is clear. These people are assholes and idiots. How do you all feel?]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Worried about penises joke</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24426/worried-about-penises-joke</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:39:13 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>AceofSpades</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24426@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[..]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Victoria&#039;s Secret Targets Pre-Teens</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24030/victoria039s-secret-targets-pre-teens</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:33:55 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mchemm2010</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24030@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Wasn't sure which category to put this in...<br />Just curious as to what you all think about this. imo its wrong. preteens/teens already have enough image issues. Can't imagine this would help. Plus would NEVER let my 12 yr old or 13 yr old sister wear stuff like that. and there's no way I'd let my daughter. <br />Bring on the opinions :) <br /><a href="http://theblacksphere.net/2013/03/victorias-secret-is-coming-for-your-middle-schooler/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://theblacksphere.net/2013/03/victorias-secret-is-coming-for-your-middle-schooler/</a>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>What the SJC discussion on gay marriage should look like:</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24166/what-the-sjc-discussion-on-gay-marriage-should-look-like</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:28:17 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>JustAGirl</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24166@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Onion nailed it:<br /><br />WASHINGTON—Ten minutes into oral arguments over whether or not homosexuals should be allowed to marry one another, a visibly confounded Supreme Court stopped legal proceedings Tuesday and ruled that gay marriage was “perfectly fine” and that the court could “care less who marries whom.”<br /><br />“Yeah, of course gay men and women can get married. Who gives a shit?” said Chief Justice John Roberts, who interrupted attorney Charles Cooper’s opening statement defending Proposition 8, which rescinded same-sex couples’ right to marry in California. “Why are we even seriously discussing this?”<br /><br />“Does anyone else up here care about this?” Roberts added as his eight colleagues began shaking their heads and saying, “No,” “Nah,” and “I also don’t care about this.” “Great. Same-sex marriage is legal in the United States of America. Do we have anything of actual import on the docket, or are we done for the day?”<br /><br />Before Roberts officially ended proceedings, sources confirmed that all nine justices were reportedly dumbfounded, asking why the case was even coming before them and wondering aloud if some sort of mistake had been made. Calling marriage equality a “no-brainer,” members of the High Court appeared not just confused but irritated when Proposition 8 defenders argued that gay marriage was not a national issue but a state matter.<br /><br />Moreover, when Attorney Cooper said that gay marriage could harm the moral fabric of the country and hurt the institution of marriage, Associate Justice Sotomayor asked, “What are you even talking about?” while Justice Anthony Kennedy reportedly muttered, “You got to be fucking kidding me,” under his breath.<br /><br />“I have to interject, Mr. Cooper,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said as the attorney argued that the government has legitimate reasons to discourage same-sex couples from getting married. “Do you honestly care this much about this issue? Because if you do, you’re a real goddamn idiot. Actually, you sound as dumb as dog shit, and you are wasting our time.”<br /><br />“Should gay marriage be legal?” Ginsburg continued. “Yes. Done. Case closed. Goodbye. Christ, were we seriously scheduled to spend the next few months debating this?”<br /><br />Even the typically conservative wing of the court maintained that, despite their personal views, it would be “downright silly” for them to rule that same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.<br /><br />“I’m a strict Originalist, Mr. Cooper, and I’m looking at a 14th Amendment that forbids any state from denying any person equal protection of the law,” Associate Justice Antonin Scalia said. “So, unless we are the most uncivilized society on the face of God’s green earth, I think we can all agree that a gay person is in fact a person. So what I’m saying is, who the fuck are we to tell a person who he or she can get married to? This is dumb. Can we talk about a real case now, please?”<br /><br />Before adjourning the court, Roberts said there would be no official opinion on the case because it’s just “common goddamn sense,” and then addressed gay men and women directly.<br /><br />“Get married, don’t get married, do whatever you want,” Roberts said. “It’s the opinion of this court that we don’t give two shits what you do.”<br /><br />“C’mon, let’s go get some food,” added Roberts, as the eight other justices followed him out the door.]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Fuck you, very much!</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/23970/fuck-you-very-much</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:35:47 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sassy</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23970@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">Do not sit here and tell me that giving men the right to walk away from fatherhood is making us "equal." Fuck. You.&nbsp;</span><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">Yes, in an ideal world a man would be able to tell a woman she can't abort because he wants to be a father, and he'd be able to make her carry to term and give the baby over.&nbsp;</div><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">In a perfect world we wouldn't get pregnant unless we wanted to.&nbsp;</div><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;"><br></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">In a perfect world adults would have an ADULTFUCKINGCONVERSATION about what will be done if an&nbsp;unintended&nbsp;pregnancy occurs BEFORE screwing around.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">To sit here and tell me that giving men the right to walk away from fatherhood would equalize the sexes is bullshit.&nbsp;</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">Yes, at this point women can abort the baby if they don't want it. I get that, but you know what? It is the WOMAN's body that has to go through the rigors and risks of pregnancy. It is the WOMAN who risks her future reproductive abilities when getting an abortion. It is the WOMAN who has to deal with the hormone shifts and emotional mess following an abortion, pregnancy or adoption of her child.&nbsp;</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">THAT is why you don't have a fucking say in it.</span></div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">If men were able to &nbsp;financially "abort" from their unintended babies then that would put all reproductive responsibility solely on women. Men would be able to go fuck with reckless abandon, impregnate however many women they want and not have to deal with any consequence, while women would have to deal with it all. Just because he "didn't want to be a father."</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">HOW THE FUCK IS THAT IN ANY WAY EQUAL?!</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: small;">So fuck you very much you self-centered, closed minded prick. Open you eyes a little bit before you go all mens-rights and put your foot in your mouth.&nbsp;</span></div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Boys+SingleMom=Bad?</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/24032/boys-singlemombad</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:39:50 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous39</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24032@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Okay ladies! Opinions on this one!<br /><br />I am on msn and fighting with what appears to be "based on his retarded out dated opinion" an older man. <br /><br />The article I commented on was boys and teaching them to be kind. <br />And how single moms tend to raise boys more sensitive to women.<br />I agree with this. Simple because my dad lived away for work as we got older.<br />So, my mom pretty much raised me and my brother.<br />My brother isn't as (I hate this word, it's banned from my home) the man put it a sissy.<br />He is a marine and married. And a really nice, sweet guy.<br />And that's because my mom raised him to respect women.<br />I want to raise my son to be respectful of women. <br />And I don't agree it means beating the shit out of your son.<br />I am sorry. I think the cycle of anger and aggression is a learned behavior.<br />Past generations used aggression to beat out aggression.<br />Clearly it didn't work. <br /><br />I think kindness, respect, and pure of heart are more important to me.<br />I don't want a little mini dick head for a son.<br />I am going to raise him to be a kind person. That's what I want.<br />I am tired of serial killers, rapists, and egotistical males. <br />Times are changing and I think it's for the better.<br /> <br />I think women are more progressive than men recently.<br />And a single mom home is a-okay by me!! <br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Homicide or not?</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/23893/homicide-or-not</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:15:45 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>OxiMOM</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23893@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I kind of want to start this discussion but I don't want it to turn into an all out fight so anyone who takes part please keep an open mind to anyone who may feel different then you. <br /><br />Yesterday afternoon an 86 year old man walked into the hospital and went to the 4th floor hospice unit where his wife was for end of life care after suffering a massive stroke. He had a gun he shot her and then him self. <br /><br />On the comments for the news article there are two sides. The people who feel this was a homicide, and those who feel it was a mercy killing, and find it touching and a true act of love. <br /><br />I'm curious to see where you all stand on this?  I'm also curious as to how everyone on here feels about assisted suicide  and if it should be an option for those who want that option.  <br /><br />Personally I feel it should be an option. I know you can travel out of the country to have it done but any family members who travel with you can be charged with murder or being an accessory to a crime upon return home.   <br /><br />Personally if my boys were grown and I became ill I would much rather have the option to spend time with DH and my boys at home say our goodbyes then go quickly and painlessly.  I don't want my loved ones to also suffer with me if I were to have to go to an end of life care and wait for weeks or days till I go naturally.  But this is just my opinion I know others feel differently and I'm open to a discussion to hear how others feel about this topic.    ]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>ANOTHER cell phone rant</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/23966/another-cell-phone-rant</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:51:55 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>BellaBefana</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23966@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I really don't fucking believe it!!! &nbsp;People's idea of their own self importance just blows me to hell and back.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>AGAIN, today but coming home from the doc's, I'm going through a green light on a 3 lane road. &nbsp;I'm in the middle lane, a car just ahead of me in the left (thank God), when in THE MIDDLE OF THE FLIPPIN' INTERSECTION the car in the right lane starts to drift into my lane. &nbsp;Now I use "drift" loosely here, because seriously people, is it no longer like part of the first day of driver's training that YOU DO NOT CHANGE LANES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE FRICKING INTERSECTION????? &nbsp;Any way, she's drifting right the fuck on top of me! &nbsp;Thankfully, as I said above, the car on the other side was enough ahead that I was able to pull over quickly. &nbsp;When I got up beside this bitch, guess what the hell she was doing? &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Yep, the dumb ass bitch in the dark green Chevy full size p/u with AZ license plates traveling east on Pecos between Val Vista and Higley in Gilbert (yes I really hope you're an SM follower so you can see how fucking pissed I am right now) was looking down at her phone and fucking texting away!!!!!! &nbsp;Well, I leaned on my horn and she kind of looked at me like whaaaat? &nbsp;And this wasn't a kid, but a middle aged woman...I know I'm old, but I'm really not that old-fogeyish, I don't think anyway....</div><div><br></div><div>You know how certain accidents are almost always your fault regardless, like if you rear-end someone? &nbsp;I think it should be that way for not having your eyes on the road and hands on the wheel, so that some of the more brazen of us could plow into these idiots. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Worst part? &nbsp;If she had hit me, she would have hit the passenger side, where dd's car seat is...thank God she wasn't with me today. &nbsp;I saw a police officer parked gunning for speeders on the way home and I seriously thought about pulling a u-turn and going over to talk to him, because believe or not, this happened on almost the EXACT place as the last time only the opposite direction.</div><div><br></div><div>So, let me repeat, YOU ARE NOT THAT IMPORTANT, NOR ARE YOUR CALLS, that you're allowed to put me, my daughter, and my only vehicle at risk. &nbsp;NO ONE IS.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div> [-(  X(  X(  X( ]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Sequester THIS</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/23865/sequester-this</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:23:19 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>SuperSarahGee</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23865@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: georgia, serif; line-height: 18px; background-color: rgb(238, 234, 234);">I think I'm guilty of catching up on scarymommy discussion boards when I'm especially excited about something I've written. &nbsp;Which, I confess, is the case right now. &nbsp;So read it and weep. &nbsp;No really, you might cry, my writing is just that touching. &nbsp;Cough cough.</span><div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-family: georgia, serif; vertical-align: baseline; line-height: 18px; background-color: rgb(238, 234, 234);"><br></div><div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-family: georgia, serif; vertical-align: baseline; line-height: 18px; background-color: rgb(238, 234, 234);">By the way, it's about how fucked we are because of the sequester. &nbsp;And by 'we' I mean me, my husband, and our kids.<br><div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><br></div><div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: inherit; color: #cc0000;"><span style="font-style: inherit;"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.quackbaby.com/7/post/2013/03/sequester-this.html">www.quackbaby.com</a></span></span></div></div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Storms... Ya or Nay</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/15530/storms-ya-or-nay</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:16:52 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dreamer</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15530@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I personally LOVE a good thunder storm.&nbsp; The bigger, the brighter, the louder the better...</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>What say you?</p>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>What Constitutes Child Abuse?</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/23608/what-constitutes-child-abuse</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:00:31 -0600</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ABC</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23608@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I was just reading another thread about discipline.&nbsp; There were mixed reviews.&nbsp; That made me think of my landlords.&nbsp; Let me explain a few things before I get into it.</p><p>Ok, this past summer was crazy.&nbsp; In late July the movie theater massacre happened here (at my favorite theater) and lo and behold, bitch-murderer lived two doors down the street from me (figures). Anyway, two weeks later, everything started calming down from that when the&nbsp;neighbor, below us, decided to burn down the four story apartment building adjacent to us where my landlords lived. Two of my neighbors died, everyone was homeless, and two dozen of them were injured (many jumped from 3-4 stories up to hit concrete).&nbsp; Landlords were the target.&nbsp; We all had to evacuate (and stay in a shelter overnight while they had a standoff with killer).&nbsp; It was a five alarm fire.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p>Ok, so we've all been through a lot here (hence my anxiety worsening).&nbsp; My landlords relocated to my building, just doors down the hallway, same floor.&nbsp; A lot of people moved away from here after all that craziness.&nbsp; So, here's the thing.&nbsp; I never lived in the same building as them until August after the fire.&nbsp; So, I never heard them on a day to day basis.&nbsp; It's a two-bedroom apartment and the mom lives there with her adult son and his two special needs (mentally) kids. They both scream at the kids all of the time.&nbsp; My dh has&nbsp;seen the dad degrade the little girl too.&nbsp; But what really bothers me is how they scream and the way they yell at the kids, especially the girl.&nbsp; Yesterday, the adult son was almost like growling, "What the fuck is wrong with you!!!! Why are you closing your eyes??? What the FUCK are YOU afraid of???" This is their way of dealing with her issues.&nbsp; She has a very low-self esteem and feels unloved (says her grandma, adult son's mom).&nbsp; </p><p>Is this abuse or am I being too sensitive?&nbsp; I lose my shit with dd8 but not often and she is treated with endless love and respect every single day.&nbsp; They do this all of the time, most of the time.&nbsp; I just feel so bad for the kids :( It breaks my heart to hear the way they are treated.</p>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>High School Dropouts</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/23482/high-school-dropouts</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:38:14 -0700</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Grits</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23482@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[So, I'm listening to the news this morning and there was a segment on the debate over raising our state's age limit for dropping out of high school from 16 to 18. It made me think...<div><br></div><div>Even as recently as 50 years ago, a majority of families in rural communities like mine have relied heavily on agriculture as a way of life. For anyone who has not witnessed a working farm in motion, it is a tireless, thankless job that begins before dawn and ends well after the sun sets. So it was not an uncommon thing for kids to attend school until 8th grade or so and then drop out to work the land with the rest of their families. But these days, that's rarely the case. And a high school education or equivalent is a minimum requirement for employment. With the changes that we have seen as a nation over the last half-century, should kids even be allowed to drop out? I personally think that every child that has access to a public school should be required to graduate. For those who struggle with school, maybe the requirements for a diploma could be relaxed in special cases. But it seems to me more logical to give kids a fighting chance to see some success once they reach adulthood by mandating graduation.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>So is this just my part of the world where I'm seeing the flaw in the existence of &nbsp;a "drop out age"? What do you think? Should dropping out of high school still be an option?&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Sexy Panties for a 17 yr old</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/22987/sexy-panties-for-a-17-yr-old</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:30:41 -0700</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Discombobulated</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">22987@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[My husband has primary custody of his 17 y/o daughter. &nbsp;Her mom gave her up voluntarily because she couldnt handle her. &nbsp;i have been in her life since the age of 2, when they got divorced. &nbsp;Now at 17 and a jr in high school, she and her mom are buddy buddy, which is ok. &nbsp;So now her mom takes her shopping and buys her lace and sheer thongs, and red lace bra and panty sets... even a thong with a zipper in the front. &nbsp;I personally dont think its appropriate to buy that for a 17 year old girl. &nbsp;<div><br></div><div>What are your thougts on this? &nbsp;curious how the scales tip.</div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Boob Jobs</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/20001/boob-jobs</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:51:15 -0700</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>GisleyandHank</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20001@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I just found out my BFF (who, by the way, is always complaining about being broke) is planning on using her tax return to get a boob job.</p><br><p>I try not to be too judgemental about plastic surgery as a rule. I think it's really sad when people feel that they have to surgically change their appearance in order to feel complete. My step sister got a nose job a couple years back and even though I didn't really approve, I didn't say anything because people have given her a hard time about her nose her whole life and it was clearly a very big deal to her. It just makes me angry that people made her feel like that was her only option. I believe that everyone has their own unique potential for beauty, whether they choose to embrace it is their decision.</p><br><p>But boob jobs are weird to me because I just can't get my head around the concept of big boobs = beauty. Little boobs are pretty too. I could understand someone who had had a mascectomy wanting fake boobs. I could understand someone with saggy boobs after kids wanting a lift. But my friend is one of the most beautiful people I've ever met in realy life. She's tall, naturally thin, and&nbsp;a boy shape. She's always had lots of male attention (we've been friends since we were 14) and she's now happily married. And she has A-cups.</p><br><p>I am so frustrated right now, especially because she JUST said to me yesterday&nbsp;"we're on such a tight budget I can't even afford mascara". But I haven't said anything because I feel it's really her decision. She didn't ask my opinion, and presumably this is a big deal to her even though this is the first I've heard of it. And maybe I'm secretly just mad because her boobs are going to be nicer than mine?</p><br><p>P.S. I'm also pissed her husband is supporting this, isn't it the Hubby's job to say "No Babe, your tits look great."?</p>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Am I Allowed to Mention a Kickstarter Campaign?</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/21141/am-i-allowed-to-mention-a-kickstarter-campaign</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:40:16 -0700</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>SuperSarahGee</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">21141@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I hope I'm not doing anything against the rules here... if I am, I assume this post will be taken down? &nbsp;In any case, I'm sort of going bonkers with this year-long staying at home thing (it's been wonderful, of couse.. but, well, you know...) so I've taken my life by the horns and started a small tutoring businesses, teaching preschoolers how to read. &nbsp;(And no, we don't, like, PRESSURE them about it... we just use an approach that really ensures their success.) &nbsp;Now, for some start-up dough, I've launched a fundraising campaign through kickstarter: &nbsp;<div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2137701742/tiny-readers-starter-kit" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2137701742/tiny-readers-starter-kit</a><div><br></div><div>I figured if YOU'RE a full-time mom who feels it in your heart to support another full-time mom's business venture, well, here's your chance. &nbsp;Thanks! &nbsp;And sorry... if this isn't, like, allowed.</div></div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Do I have a right?</title>
      <link>http://www.scarymommy.com/message-board/index.php?p=/discussion/20805/do-i-have-a-right</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:34:12 -0700</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MsAsdy</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20805@/message-board/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In light of the tragedy in Connecticut I find myself looking to the children I'm responsible for and wondering if I'm doing enough. I'm not a teacher...but I am a supervisor within a child care facility. Every day I see the kiddos, I talk to them, I get hugs from them...and then I see one in particular. <br>His behavior lately has gotten dramatically worse. He was in my office the other day because he had to be removed from the classroom and said "I'm going to kill myself." It was spoken very softly and I did a double take, asking him to repeat himself. From there I sat down beside him, asked him why he would say such a thing...got a run down of how everyone hates him and how he's the worst kid. <br>His behavior is sporadic. I've seen him throw massive fits where he's out of control and his emotional highs are extremely high. But when he's sweet...MAN is he sweet. I know that he's got an appt. to see a therapist in January but my question is...do I have a right to try to counsel this young man? To step in and see if there are some underlying issues contributing to his behavior? To talk to him about things that might be confusing him and making him hurt? I'm not a therapist. Not even close. I just want to help the poor kid and with as quickly down hill as he's going I fear that January won't be soon enough. If he was your kid and you found out someone unlicensed was trying to help him and talk to him about his behavior how would you handle it? <br>]]></description>
   </item>
   </channel>
</rss>